[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: strange table index "end"
- From: Gé Weijers <ge@...>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 09:41:59 -0800 (PST)
I agree that the special case of <expr>.<keyword> could be resolved by
having the lexer produce an identifier after the token '.'.
Once you do that the next request will be to support
{ function = 3 }
as the equivalent of
{ ["function"] = 3 }
This is trickier because
{ function = 3 }
and
{ function () return 5 end }
would both be legal and now we need more lookahead. I believe it's better
not to go down this road. Error messages become less meaningful as well.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
When local variables are allowed to be identical to keywords as well,
then the parser suddenly gets a magnitude more complex!
locel end = 1
if foocondition then end = end + 1 end
if foo then end
This is useless but correct Lua, which makes your example no longer
parsable using one token lookahead either.
Ge'