[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011
- From: Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@...>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:46:11 +0300
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 16:44, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Alexander Gladysh <agladysh@gmail.com> wrote:
>> (After discussion:) So, no more need for patched Lua, right?
> I'd say so. Once you see it as a dynamic run-time problem, then error
> messages are straightforward.
Good. :-)
> Now, if you wanted to _debug_ the result ... ;)
The same.
You take the stack information and patch it before studying.
Alexander.
- References:
- [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Mike Pall
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, dcharno
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Petri Häkkinen
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Mike Pall
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Florian Weimer
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Michal Kottman
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Florian Weimer
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, David Given
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, David Given
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, steve donovan
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: [ANN] LuaJIT Roadmap 2011, steve donovan