[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view
- From: Rob Kendrick <rjek@...>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:02:05 +0000
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:57:47AM +0000, Paul Hudson wrote:
> > `do` `[` args `]` chunk `end`
> >
> > with a short return token wouldn't be too bad. It looks more like the
> > usual Lua syntax.
> >
>
> Yuk. Anyone infected with Unix (or Perl) would try to see what command is
> being evaluate between the ` characters.
I suspect he is just using them to show what are tokens, and what
aren't, and it would be used like this:
do [ x, y ] return x * y end
Although this is only six non-chorded keypresses shorter than what we
already have :)
B.
- References:
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Gunnar Zötl
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Luis Carvalho
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Mateusz Czaplinski
- Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Pierre-Yves Gérardy
- Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view, Paul Hudson