Re: Re: Re: Lightweight syntax: a dissident view

[Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>]

> AFAICT, the only unambiguous syntax is the following:
> 
>     `initial_token` [arglist] `separator` [chunk] `final_token´
> or
>     `initial_token` [arglist] `separator` [explist] `final_token´
> 
> with `final_token` ~= `initial_token`, and various restrictions on the
> individual tokens to avoid ambiguities.

For instance:

initial_token = '\'
separator = '. ('
final_token = ')'

e.g.: \x.(x+1)    \x,y.(x+y)	\.(3)

-- Roberto