[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: OOBit
- From: Nilson <nilson.brazil@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:08:07 -0300
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:12 PM, KHMan <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 9/29/2010 9:57 PM, Nilson wrote:
>> I am newbie here. If you read my previous messages, you will see that
>> I was asking for comments about the patch before I write it. I
>> thought that I could use this mailing list with this purpose, am I
> There is some clear negative pushback. Here is one more, of the preachy
> nonsense kind. One big target you painted on yourself is the big claims on
> performance increase -- based on instruction counting, uh, estimating.
Well, before you build anything you should perform some calculations
and do a viability analysis, isn't? If you count the instructions in
x86 assembly, you will see that the estimate was quite accurated.
I bring the subject to the mailing list because there were many
decisions to take and I really could appreciate suggestions.
Well, there came no actual suggestions and people are becoming ... emphatic.
So, to calm down things, I will try hard to avoid answering messages
about OOBit subject, ok?