[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT 1.1.5 issue/bug?
- From: Tim Mensch <tim-lua-l@...>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:14:06 -0600
Mike Pall wrote:
Tim Mensch wrote:
> I'm using LuaJIT 1.1.5 embedded in a Windows/Mac game SDK (Playground),
> and it's be working fine for me.
Ah, good to know.
Too bad I can't type, though. "It's be working..." Ah well.
OK, I'll be sure to include that in the docs. I will consider shifting
to 2.x later, though I'm not sure that it will actually work as well for
us: The alternate C stacks in LuaJIT 1.x mean that people can suspend
their coroutines from within their C functions, and with C functions on
the stack. I assume that won't work in LuaJIT 2.x because of the new way
things work? Or am I wrong?
But one thing: I'd like to ask you to make it clear for your users
that you're using LuaJIT 1.x and not 2.x. Most of the talk on the
Lua mailing list or elsewhere now focuses on 2.x features and
performance. That could be a potential source of confusion for
> One of the SDK users, though, pointed
> out a problem reported when using the Microsoft Application Verifier.
That's what made be doubt my own eyes. And his bug report at first,
frankly. My gut was that the Application Verifier was broken with
respect to JIT code, but then I realized this was happening before the
JIT code was even generated, so I dug deeper.
Congratulations! He found the first real bug since two years. :-)
That's the correct fix.
Glad I was able to help. :)
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4969 (20100323) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.