[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Re[4]: string:sub
- From: Jorge <xxopxe@...>
- Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:43:26 -0200
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 17:25 +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> >> afaik, Lua philosophy is to guarantee that no crash or security
> >> violation can occur. such philosophy doesn't prohibit g.in->g.out, though
>
> > I think he was referring to c.
>
> he said about "Lua's philosophy, not unlike C's one"
>
> i think that Lua, unlike C, should be safe. in terms of both: crashes
> and security violations
That's language level. On your application level, you are responsible
for validating data. An example is SQL injection: no mather how secure
you database is, if your app don't validate input, breaches will occur.
Jorge
- References:
- string:sub, David Burgess
- Re: string:sub, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: string:sub, David Burgess
- Re: string:sub, Erik Lindroos
- Re: string:sub, David Burgess
- Re: string:sub, Enrico Colombini
- Re: string:sub, spir
- Re: string:sub, Scott Vokes
- Re: string:sub, joao lobato
- Re: string:sub, Philippe Lhoste
- Re[2]: string:sub, Bulat Ziganshin
- Re: Re[2]: string:sub, Alex Davies
- Re[4]: string:sub, Bulat Ziganshin