[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Ah, those uninitiated people...
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 07:34:34 +0200
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Fabien <fleutot+lua@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyway, I can't think of a reasonnable use case for jumping inside a loop,
> and the "proper" way to handle local variables in which scope you entered is
> unclear at best.
That's the nasty bit; C++ has to work hard to get gotos to work sensibly.
All in all, my momentary irritation with no 'goto' simply meant I had
to think a bit more about the problem, and then end up with a clearer
solution anyway. It's like 'life without setfenv', it makes us
reevaluate the use cases.
steve d.
- References:
- Ah, those uninitiated people..., Alexander Gladysh
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Enrico Colombini
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Andrew Wilson
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Mark Hamburg
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., steve donovan
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Jerome Vuarand
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Joshua Jensen
- Re: Ah, those uninitiated people..., Fabien