[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [OT] ORMs (was Re: '__iter', yet again!)
- From: Petite Abeille <petite.abeille@...>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:28:22 +0100
On Dec 20, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Richard Hundt wrote:
> Since this is OT, I'll just include a link to my response to the above here:
>
> http://bluehive.blogspot.com/2009/12/response-to-orms-being-veitnam-of.html
"I'll start with the underlying assumption that an RDBMS must, by definition, have a "relational data model". This is not the case."
Hmmm... right... in that case... if your database is simply a glorified key-value pair dump, then, yes, it doesn't really matter how you access your RDBMS as you are most likely not using any of its functionalities. But then again, why bother with a RDBMS to start with then?
> ORM's still have a place in my toolbox and I'm building one for Lua right now ;)
More power to you :)
- References:
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, Jerome Vuarand
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, steve donovan
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, Javier Guerra
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, Mark Hamburg
- Re: '__iter', yet again!, Petite Abeille
- ORMs (was Re: '__iter', yet again!), Mark Hamburg
- Re: [OT] ORMs (was Re: '__iter', yet again!), Petite Abeille
- Re: [OT] ORMs (was Re: '__iter', yet again!), Richard Hundt