Re: The current state of interfacing Lua with C++ code

["Martin C. Martin" <martin@...>]

Thanks!

I'll try SWIG first, since I'm not set on using Lua, but want to explore 
other languages as well.  Once I settle on an extension language I can 
start worrying about performance, etc.

Thanks,
Martin

Colm Sloan wrote:
> So to recap, I think this is the list for you, Martin:
>
> Lunar
> OOLua
> Lua++
> SWIG
> Luabind
> LuaPlus
>
> I'm not sure if any of them are the same thing or not. I may be wrong 
> here but I believe that at the moment, OOLua is the fastest. I tried 
> SWIG and Lua++ but didn't like them. Currently, I use Luabind because 
> it's just easy to work with. Give them all a good read-up before 
> choosing one.