[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT performance
- From: Rob Kendrick <lua-l@...>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:50:34 +0100
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:26:40 +0200
Mike Pall <mikelu-0908@mike.de> wrote:
> Their TraceMonkey JIT compiler can turn this into a check for
> integer overflow in many cases. But the required logic for
> managing the two number domains looks excessive. Has anybody ever
> dared to run Firefox on a FP-challenged ARM box with JS-intensive
> apps? Whee ...
*Firefox* is a JS-intensive app. And yes, it's painful :) I found a
nice YouTube video the other day showing Firefox on a 200MHz StrongARM,
and it taking 4 minutes to load, and 5 minutes to show a window, due to
the UI basically being JS and XML.
--
B.