[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua Programming Gems now available at Amazon
- From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <lhf@...>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 08:37:16 -0200
> I've already learned something new from reading through Roberto's - in the
> middle of a pairs()/next() loop, it is no problem to change the *current*
> key in the table (previously I had believed that tables should not be
> modified at all when traversing them). Setting a different key may cause the
> loop to terminate early if you are setting the value to nil, or trigger a
> rehash if it is not. But setting the current key to something else,
> including nil, should always be fine. Is that right?
The explanation for next mentions this:
The behavior of next is undefined if, during the traversal, you assign
any value to a non-existent field in the table. You may however modify
existing fields. In particular, you may clear existing fields.