[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Best Practices for Lua -> "Lua+"?
- From: "steve donovan" <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:06:51 +0200
My apologies if it appeared that a sensible person like you would want
such things. It is my compulsive refactoring gene kicking in again.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Miles Bader <email@example.com> wrote:
> "steve donovan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Yes, it isn't that difficult to make Lua look like another language,
> > but the difficulty comes when people expect the same semantics ;)
> > people who are expecting the same forgiving number-string
> > autoconversions.
> Just a side note, but please don't edit the quotes so that it looks like
> I was advocating such awful changes... :-/
> [Especially the bit about whitespace -- I think python is a horrid
> language syntactically; the idea of making Lua look like it makes me
> Cynic, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as
> they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a
> cynic's eyes to improve his vision.