[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package]
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:03:05 -0300
> IMO, the value of having 'continue' would be much greater than that of this
> scope rule. I'd love to see canceling this rule in favor of adding
> 'continue'. That is, the expression-parameter of 'until' would resolve its
> variables in the scope enclosing the repeat loop.
My point was not to present that as a reason to avoid 'continue', but to
present a real example of how simple and innocent changes to a language
can have hidden and pernicious side effects.
-- Roberto
- References:
- Location of a package, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: Location of a package, Tomas Guisasola Gorham
- Re: Location of a package, Ignacio Burgueño
- Re: Location of a package, Fabien
- Re: Location of a package, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Location of a package, eugeny gladkih
- upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Shmuel Zeigerman
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: upcoming changes in Lua 5.2 [was Re: Location of a package], Shmuel Zeigerman