Re: Function definitions in table constructors

[Miles Bader <miles@...>]

Mark Hamburg <mhamburg@adobe.com> writes:
>> so table-constructor methods have a lightweight syntax.
>
> But to really make it pay off one needs some way to also remove the need for
> a comma after the end.

Yeah, I've always found the need for "," or ";" inside table
constructors inside tables annoying...  Do things become overly
ambiguous without them though?

-Miles

-- 
Selfish, adj. Devoid of consideration for the selfishness of others.