Re: Function definitions in table constructors

["Duncan Cross" <duncan.cross@...>]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Alex Davies <alex.mania@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> It's quite an easy change to the parser, see:
>  http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-01/msg00525.html
>
>  The patch is a little different though - for my oo system I prefer to have
>  implicit selfs inside table functions,

Perhaps the best solution would be to combine this with a second,
independent change that takes:

   function :anonmethod(a,b,c)
      ...
   end

as syntactic sugar for:

   anonmethod = function(self,a,b,c)
      ...
   end

so table-constructor methods have a lightweight syntax.