[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: CMake and Lua
- From: Ben <thebassplayer@...>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:16:47 -0800
Yeah, but didn't most languages like Lua start out as "roll your own" languages?
Ben
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Eric Tetz <erictetz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Brandon Van Every <bvanevery@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> I think that, in a nut shell, is why tool developers should think long and
> hard before rolling their own languages. CMake is a build tool, why are they
> wasting cycles on language design? Lua (and plenty of other languages) have
> spent years working through these same issues, why duplicate that effort?
>
>
- References:
- CMake and Lua, Ken Martin
- Re: CMake and Lua, Thiago Bastos
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, E. Wing
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz