Re: lists with nil play nice for Lua 5.2

["Aaron Brown" <arundelo@...>]

David Manura wrote:

> The above could be avoided if we could write this (why
> can't we?):
>
> function tuple(...)
>   return function(f) return f(...) end
> end
>
> It's my opinion that the implementation of varargs in 5.1
> is overly restrictive:
> http://lua-users.org/wiki/VarargTheSecondClassCitizen

See <http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2007-03/msg00249.html>,
where Roberto says:

> Not likely. This would imply the creation of another kind
> of upvalues; actually up-non-values, as '...' is not a
> (regular) value ;)

--
Aaron
http://arundelo.com/