[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: hook question
- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@...>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:16:56 -0400
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 03:01:38PM -0400, Ralph Hempel wrote:
> Yes, but if the thread with this code is reading in between
> the non-atomic write of the other thread, are we not back where we
> started? :-)
True. Just waking up. I'm uncomfortable with relying on atomic_t,
though. I've never actually heard of it being a standard type, or
seen it in any code outside of the Linux kernel, and that defines
it itself.
--
Glenn Maynard
- References:
- Re: hook question, Rici Lake
- Re: hook question, Glenn Maynard
- Re: hook question, Rici Lake
- Re: hook question, Glenn Maynard
- Re: hook question, Rici Lake
- Re: hook question, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: hook question, David Jones
- Re: hook question, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: hook question, Glenn Maynard
- Re: hook question, Ralph Hempel