Re: Perferred OO System? Alternatives to even OO?

[Asko Kauppi <askok@...>]

My guess: people are afraid that calling theirs "class" would be  
plain too bold.

And prone to fall behind, once official class libraries someday  
surface (that'll be the day... ;)

-asko


Zed A. Shaw kirjoitti 13.10.2006 kello 2.24:

> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:10:24 -0600
> "Gavin Kistner" <gavin.kistner@anark.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Zed A. Shaw
> > > 1) What's people's favored OO system for Lua and the
> > > advantages/disadvantages?
> >
> > I wrote my own OO system that mimics (but doesn't match) the  
> > basics of
> > Ruby's inheritance hierarchy.
> > http://phrogz.net/AnarkSamples/AKClassHierarchy.lua
>
> Looks good.  What's the license on it though.  Seems people do  
> three things in Lua:
>
> 1) Write their own OO system.
> 2) Avoid the words "[Cc]lass", "[Oo]bject", and "new"
> 3) Not put a license on it.
>
> Are there particular reasons for this?  Like, "class" is reserved  
> or clashes?
>
> --
> Zed A. Shaw, MUDCRAP-CE Master Black Belt Sifu
> http://www.zedshaw.com/
> http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/
> http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 -- Come get help.