[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Perferred OO System? Alternatives to even OO?
- From: "Zed A. Shaw" <zedshaw@...>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:24:21 -0700
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:10:24 -0600
"Gavin Kistner" <gavin.kistner@anark.com> wrote:
> From: Zed A. Shaw
> > 1) What's people's favored OO system for Lua and the
> > advantages/disadvantages?
>
> I wrote my own OO system that mimics (but doesn't match) the basics of
> Ruby's inheritance hierarchy.
> http://phrogz.net/AnarkSamples/AKClassHierarchy.lua
>
Looks good. What's the license on it though. Seems people do three things in Lua:
1) Write their own OO system.
2) Avoid the words "[Cc]lass", "[Oo]bject", and "new"
3) Not put a license on it.
Are there particular reasons for this? Like, "class" is reserved or clashes?
--
Zed A. Shaw, MUDCRAP-CE Master Black Belt Sifu
http://www.zedshaw.com/
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/
http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 -- Come get help.
