On Thursday 20 April 2006 4:12 pm, Kristopher Lohmuller wrote:
Thanks. For some reason 5.0 accepts the (not disp and not next(disp)),
but it still doesn't like the alternatives in the for statement.
Recognizes that they are valid calls, but still says it is expecting a
table value for disp but that disp is nil. Odd thing is that it gives
this error even if the table has a value.
that sounds like you're not giving it the right table. double check for typos
and scope. maybe you're setting a local 'disp' and accessing a global 'disp'
or something like that
remember, if you try to access a nonexistant variable, it won't give you any
error, just return a nil value. (and fail somewhere else because of that nil
value)
