[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Empty Table Manipulation
- From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:30:45 -0500
On Thursday 20 April 2006 4:12 pm, Kristopher Lohmuller wrote:
> Thanks. For some reason 5.0 accepts the (not disp and not next(disp)),
> but it still doesn't like the alternatives in the for statement.
> Recognizes that they are valid calls, but still says it is expecting a
> table value for disp but that disp is nil. Odd thing is that it gives
> this error even if the table has a value.
that sounds like you're not giving it the right table. double check for typos
and scope. maybe you're setting a local 'disp' and accessing a global 'disp'
or something like that
remember, if you try to access a nonexistant variable, it won't give you any
error, just return a nil value. (and fail somewhere else because of that nil
value)
--
Javier
Attachment:
pgpuVfODnV5d1.pgp
Description: PGP signature