Re: Empty Table Manipulation

[Javier Guerra <javier@...>]

On Thursday 20 April 2006 4:12 pm, Kristopher Lohmuller wrote:
> Thanks. For some reason 5.0 accepts the (not disp and not next(disp)),
> but it still doesn't like the alternatives in the for statement.
> Recognizes that they are valid calls, but still says it is expecting a
> table value for disp but that disp is nil. Odd thing is that it gives
> this error even if the table has a value.

that sounds like you're not giving it the right table.  double check for typos 
and scope.  maybe you're setting a local 'disp' and accessing a global 'disp' 
or something like that

remember, if you try to access a nonexistant variable, it won't give you any 
error, just return a nil value. (and fail somewhere else because of that nil 
value)

-- 
Javier

Attachment: pgpYpeZ2Nlt8v.pgp
Description: PGP signature