Re: Problems with lposix on win32

[Chris Marrin <chris@...>]

D Burgess wrote:
> ...
> Methinks Edgar had in mind that you would use
>
> require"osex"   or require"os.ex"
>
> given that you writing a C module , you can populate whicever table you
> like, in this case os.

But if you 'require "os.ex"', it will first do an implicit 'require 
"os"' and that's what I'm worried about. Will that succeed?

--
chris marrin                ,""$,
chris@marrin.com          b`    $                             ,,.
                        mP     b'                            , 1$'
        ,.`           ,b`    ,`                              :$$'
     ,|`             mP    ,`                                       ,mm
   ,b"              b"   ,`            ,mm      m$$    ,m         ,`P$$
  m$`             ,b`  .` ,mm        ,'|$P   ,|"1$`  ,b$P       ,`  :$1
 b$`             ,$: :,`` |$$      ,`   $$` ,|` ,$$,,`"$$     .`    :$|
b$|            _m$`,:`    :$1   ,`     ,$Pm|`    `    :$$,..;"'     |$:
P$b,      _;b$$b$1"       |$$ ,`      ,$$"             ``'          $$
 ```"```'"    `"`         `""`        ""`                          ,P`
"As a general rule,don't solve puzzles that open portals to Hell"'