Re: Problems with lposix on win32

[Rici Lake <lua@...>]

On 15-Jan-06, at 6:19 PM, D Burgess wrote:

> I agree with this.
>
> On 1/16/06, Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de> wrote:
> > PS: I don't like the name osex.  I'd simply put them into os.

I agree with this, too. Loading the extended os package should extend 
the existing os package, not create a new one. Truly platform specific 
os interfaces could go in separate packages or subpackages (os.macosx)