[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: From dynamic to static
- From: PA <petite.abeille@...>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:12:12 +0100
On Oct 31, 2005, at 19:19, David Given wrote:
On Monday 31 October 2005 17:06, PA wrote:
http://www.mindview.net/WebLog/log-0025
He wants to use OCaml, he does.
Even with OCaml, he wants testing:
"If it's not tested, it's broken."
"Strong testing, not strong typing."
OUnit
"OUnit is a unit test framework for OCaml"
http://www.xs4all.nl/~mmzeeman/ocaml/
Talking of which, beside lunit [1], is there any other attempt at
providing a more or less coherent unit testing framework for Lua?
Unit testing coupled with some of the debug hooks (e.g. "line") could
provide an handy code coverage tool:
"Unit Testing and Code Coverage with Xcode"
http://www.supermegaultragroovy.com/Software%20Development/
xcode_code_coverage_howto
[1] http://www.nessie.de/mroth/lunit/
