[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: RE: Time to split the ML?
- From: Vat Raghavan <machinshin2002@...>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
It seems to me a useful split would be lua the language & it's core
libraries & a ml for all the addon libraries
so a 2nd ml for luasql, luaexpat, luasocket, xavante,kepler, etc.
it may not be needed now (arguable) but i think some point in the near future
it will be, and it's something to be seriously considered now.
--- Andre Carregal <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Erik Hougaard wrote:
> > Activity is great, but maybe the Kepler Project should
> > consider creating a seperate mailinglist for kepler releated stuff?
> Fair. Just keep in mind that some of the modules maintained by the Kepler
> team (such as LuaSQL, LuaExpat, Xavante, Copas etc) have many users out of
> what would be called the "Kepler user base", and most of the mailing threads
> involving such modules are not about their development, but about issues
> found using them.
> I understand the need of different lists, but I'm not sure if the split
> should be done by now and, if/when the split comes, I'd prefer having one
> for the language itself and another for every use of it (Kepler being just
> one of them). Announcements on both lists could be identified by "[ANN]" in
> the subject or something like that as Luiz pointed out.
> Of course if Kepler modules/issues are generating that much noise, we can
> create a separate list for them.
> André Carregal
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around