Re: changes in 'require'

[Diego Nehab <diego@...>]

Hi,

> 1) Following Diego's suggestion, require "a.b" would first require "a".
> Unlike his suggestion, however, fails in that require are not silently
> ignored. (You can simply add an empty "init.lua" file into directory
> "a" to satisfy that require.)

Any reason for this?

[]s,
Diego.