Re: Lua 5.1 (work6) now available

[Wim Couwenberg <wcou@...>]

> What's your platform? I get different results:

I used Borland CBuilder 6 on a Pentium 4, 2.66 GHz PC running Win2000. 
The settings for my work5 and work6 projects are exactly the same. 
Doubles are aligned on quad word boundaries, sizeof(TValue) == 16 in 
both builds.

Both use the __asm version of number2int (though this doesn't matter 
much for this test).  Other luaconf settings are out-of-the-box.

The running times differ very consistently.  Hum, something weird is 
going on...

An observation on your test data:

Your 5.0:
> recursive version took 2.950 seconds

Your 5.1:
> recursive version took 3.560 seconds

Is this an outlier or symptomatic on your system Luiz?

--
Wim