[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: ANN: coxpcall 1.6 (was RE: Xavate crash and coxpcall missing 'arg' variable)
- From: Javier Guerra <javier@...>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 02:17:25 -0500
On 17 may 2005, at 2:02 AM, Klaus Ripke wrote:
For requests expected to be "very slow",
one might also consider "heavy weight threads" a.k.a. processes.
On current unixes, fork is not that expensive (see e.g. fnord
For win, things are much more difficult, but alas ...
hadn't thought of that!
and i should, in fact my very first Lua project (horrendously
un-luaish, but still working in production servers) used Lua just as a
'better scripts than shell', for that i wrote some c-like fork(), pipes
and wait(), so i could spawn background proceses, while managing it's
i'm sure there are better libraries for that somewhere....