[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: PepperfishProfiler
- From: William Roper <lacutis@...>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:33:27 -0700
I would say going to a web page owned by someone else and posting code
snippets would be you specifically saying here, here is some code,
have fun unless you specifically put restrictions on it's use.
I may be completely off base, but it makes more sense. I mean if it
was the case that someone has to specifically say "this is public
domain" then why does every book have a copywright notice in it? If it
was implicit that the owner retains all rights by distributing
I'm not trying to start a flame war or anything, I consider this an
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:20:43 +0100, Daniel Silverstone
> William Roper wrote:
> > Actually, I would think its safe to say that if someone posts
> > something in a public forum without a copywright notice or a license
> > that it would be public domain.
> Nup. It's just utterly and completely unusable and un-distributable :-)
> Public domain is an *explicit* rescinding of control.