[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: TkLua status
- From: Ryan Phillips <lua-l@...>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:32:28 -0700
On the subject of QT, I am using Lua as the scripting interface within my
application... I wrote a blurb on my blog a few days ago. QT's signals work
nicely.
http://www.trolocsis.com/archives/000051.html
-Ryan
On Sunday 11 April 2004 03:46 pm, Robert Anderberg wrote:
> QT and C++ offer a extremely robust and rapid development environment. If
> you haven't tried it out then you really must before you discount it.
> www.trolltech.com
>
> If you want to build GUI apps quickly, QT is the way to go. you also get
> the bonus of your app working on OSX and linux (well at least the GUI
> parts).
>
> They have their own script system, but I haven't tried it. A QT Lua binding
> would be very cool.
>
> On Thursday 08 April 2004 3:49 am, Brian Hook wrote:
> > > but is very complicated. At present this issue is holding back the
> > > entire porting effort of our project, so no tklua port either.
> >
> > Any suggestions for something else (even non-Lua) for fast development
> > of a GUI application that works on Windows? I'm trying everything
> > possible to avoid tcl/tk, but at least it works and is a known
> > quantity. I'm uncomfortable with IUP -- I dislike the number of
> > dependencies it incurs (tecmake, CD, etc.) and the user community
> > seems very small, so I worry about robustness.
> >
> > Brian