RE: TkLua status

["Jasmin Patry" <jpatry@...>]

I'd echo the sentiment for wxLua.  I was able to get something up and running very quickly by looking at the examples, and by using the wxWindows docs and the swig interface file (wxLuaWrap.i) to see how the functionality was exposed to Lua.  It is very responsive (far better that Tk), and I haven't encountered any issues with robustness so far.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eero Pajarre [mailto:epajarre@koti.soon.fi]
Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:55 PM
To: Lua list
Subject: Re: TkLua status


Brian Hook wrote:

> Any suggestions for something else (even non-Lua) for fast development 
> of a GUI application that works on Windows?  I'm trying everything 
> possible to avoid tcl/tk, but at least it works and is a known 
> quantity.  I'm uncomfortable with IUP -- I dislike the number of 
> dependencies it incurs (tecmake, CD, etc.) and the user community 
> seems very small, so I worry about robustness.
> 

wxLua might be the right 100 kg hammer for your problem...

IMHO it seems to be pretty robust, and I have been able to use
it mostly based on wx manual/help pages. (And sometimes
browsing the interface in order to check if some functionality
is not available through Lua)



		Eero