Re: [Lua list] To list administrator (OT)

["andrew cooke" <andrew@...>]

filtering is just as trivial as dropping the "[Lua List]" as far as i'm
concerned.  maybe it should be set so that those with less flexible mail
systems can do what they want, since the rest of us can fix it as we want
no matter what?

i really have no preference at all - i only send this email because people
having such strong opinions about such small details annoys me much more
than the original suggestion...

andrew

Peter Loveday said:
>> I thoroughly disagree.
>>
>> It's enough that the Reply-To is altered to the list (something I
>> disagree with). The List software correctly supplies the List-Id and
>> other List-* headers in the mails. Your mail client should use those to
>> display the mails differently for the Lua List, *or* you should use them
>> to provide some sort of key for filtering the Lua mails into another
>> mailbox.
>>
>> I don't need an entire mailbox with "[Lua List]" at the start of the
>> subject. Altering the subject is (IMO) wrong and ugly.
>
> Agreed, filtering is trivial, there's no need for extra rubbish on the
> start.
>
> Keep the reply address the way it is, though, I don't agree with that one
> :)
>
> Love, Light and Peace,
> - Peter Loveday
> Director of Development, eyeon Software
>
>


-- 
personal web site: http://www.acooke.org/andrew
personal mail list: http://www.acooke.org/andrew/compute.html