[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: SDL documentation
- From: Jared Krinke <furiousj@...>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 01:25:18 -0800
On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 01:04, Asko Kauppi wrote:
> I'll have a look. Some years back, I thought DoxyGen would be "the
> thing" but it wasn't. It made the source itself too clumsy, and also
> that should be readable by itself. These are taste issues, so let's not
> argue. :)
I had a similar experience. Robodocs looks like it would be much more
clumsy than even Doxygen.
The best solution I've come across (though I'm wating for Debian
packages before I start using it) is Natural Docs. As the name implies,
it has a very natural syntax, but it can generate good documentation.
Link: http://www.naturaldocs.org/
