Re: SDL documentation

[Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>]

I'll have a look. Some years back, I thought DoxyGen would be "the 
thing" but it wasn't. It made the source itself too clumsy, and also 
that should be readable by itself. These are taste issues, so let's not 
argue. :)

Also, the language independence looks nice since the comments in the 
C(++) code are actually for Lua interface. Thanks!

-ak

Jeremy Cowgar kirjoittaa maanantaina, 22. joulukuuta 2003, kello 03:08:

> On Sun, 2003-12-21 at 17:12, Nicolas Noble wrote:
>
> > Just as a hint: if you want to build docs from a cpp doc, you should 
> > try
> > "doxygen". Works very well, and you won't have to maintain twice the 
> > same
> > documentation ;-)
>
> I found that RoboDoc (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rfsber/Robo/) works
> excellent. It's a source document tool that does not depend on the
> language. It can document HTML if you want it to.
>
> Also, I have the inside word that it's soon going to be extendable by
> Lua, what more could you ask?
>
> ----
> jeremy <jc@cowgar.com>
>
> jeremy@myhome $ ./think
> Segmentation Fault