lua-users home
lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


Hi, Joshua...

I have a question about LuaPlus.

I was wondering if LuaPlus is distributed under the same license terms as Lua itself. I couldn't find any information in that topic in the distribution. Is it available free for non-commercial or commercial use?

Thanks
Ivo


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joshua Jensen" <jjensen@workspacewhiz.com>
To: "'Lua list'" <lua@bazar2.conectiva.com.br>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: Lua C Functions in C++ class


> Upvalues are fine, but they are hackish when all you want to do is directly
> call a C++ member function.  If your requirements allow you to work in a
> modified Lua distribution, consider this:
> 
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2002-04/msg00108.html
> 
> The functor extension described above allows you to directly register and
> call C++ member functions.
> 
> An even better mechanism is available in the C++ LuaPlus distribution
> (http://wwhiz.com/LuaPlus/index.html).  Not only can LuaPlus's approach call
> lua_State* enabled member functions, it can also call many C++ member
> functions directly that don't even require a lua_State*.  On the negative
> side, it also modified Lua to work much more efficiently.
> 
> If you simply can't modify Lua and can stand longer compile times, consider
> LuaBind (http://luabind.sourceforge.net).  It does some amazing things.
> 
> Josh
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br 
> > [mailto:lua-bounces@bazar2.conectiva.com.br] On Behalf Of Tim Conkling
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:50 PM
> > To: Lua list
> > Subject: Re: Lua C Functions in C++ class
> > 
> > Thanks a lot to everyone who replied. Userdata upvalues are 
> > exactly what I need.
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > On Oct 21, 2003, at 2:57 PM, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo wrote:
> > 
> > >> there's no way to associate any sort of user data with the 
> > exported 
> > >> functions
> > >
> > > Sure there is. You export C closures, not C functions, in 
> > fact. So C 
> > > function can have upvalues.
> > > --lhf
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
>