RE: FW: [LuaCheia] licening [was: New sourceforge project.9

[Asko Kauppi <Asko.Kauppi@...>]

Lua license or the X11 (which Lua 5.0 uses) get my vote.

Zlib is seldom used and therefore will make the thing look more exotic,
exactly what we're striving against.

-ak


-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Spernau [mailto:martin@traumwind.de]
Sent: 11. helmikuuta 2003 11:44
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: FW: [LuaCheia] licening [was: New sourceforge project.9


I would suggest the Lua-license, as many of the modules to be used are 
already under that licence.
I - personally - would like to avoid GPL, rather have LGPL, as to not 
hinder the acceptance of the project with people who need to incororate 
it into commercial products.

-Martin

Asko Kauppi wrote:

>Because of the modular structure, we'll end up having parts that are GPL,
or
>any other Open Source license for that matter... What part would you think
>the Zlib covers?
>
>-ak
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Björn De Meyer [mailto:bjorn.demeyer@pandora.be]
>Sent: 11. helmikuuta 2003 2:48
>To: Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: [LuaCheia] New sourceforge project.
>
>
>I decided to start a new Sourceforge project 
>because of the space restrictions on the wiki, 
>mentioned in another mail. I would like to ask 
>of those of you who are interested in the project 
>to register a Sourceforge username if you don't 
>have one already, and mail it to me, so I can add 
>you to the project, when it gets approved. Thank you.
>
>FYI: I chose the zlib license as this is really the 
>least common denominator I could think of. I hope
>this is acceptable.
>
>
>  
>
###########################################
This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.