Re: C# and Lua

[Markus Fritsche <Fritsche.Markus@...>]

MichaelL@frogware.com wrote:

> When .NET was being brought to life, though, the promise was for rather 
> more than that. The promise was that you could use a single 
> back-end--with its compiler, debugger, profiler, and class 
> libraries--with a varierty of languages. Microsoft either paid for or 
> promoted efforts to bring a variety of langauges to .NET to show that 
> this was possible.

.NET Supports only languages that are are subset or equivalent to C# (or 
languages that are cut down to be a C# equivalent). I'm not sure if this 
multi language thing and it's few advantages will outweight the big 
disadvantages.

Regards, Markus

--
http://reauktion.de/archer/