[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: The Lua C API
- From: "Jens Wessling" <wessling@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:51:35 -0400
I meant lua_dostring, not dostring. lua_dostring() returns 0 in case of
success,
and an error code otherwise.
I guess what I said was unclear. I did not necessarily mean that
dostring does not take arguments or have a return value. I just meant
that for _routines_ that took no arguments and return no values, dostring
is a good choice.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Jensen" <jjensen@workspacewhiz.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <lua-l@tecgraf.puc-rio.br>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: The Lua C API
> > > - what is a common way of calling an "AI" routine written in Lua?
> > There are two basic alternatives that we use.
> > - dostring -> This is the easy way to call a routine that takes
> no
> > arguments, and returns nothing.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but dostring() returns the return values of the
> global code that is run (which usually has no return values).
>
> Josh
>