[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: To all Lua rock maintainers, take 2 (now with human-friendly reporting), you help is appreciated again
- From: François Perrad <francois.perrad@...>
- Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:11:09 +0200
when the revision of the rockspec is 1, 102 is displayed after the dash.
2015-09-13 23:04 GMT+02:00 Stefano <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Hi All,
> Based on the previous feedback, I implemented friendly html reporting for
> your convenience.
> List of all available modules (i.e. the ones that pass on all 3 OS):
> List of the build results for each Lua rock taken into consideration:
> Both links are accessible from ULua's main page (which is not my project
> main page):
> It still needs some finishing touches but should be more useful and
> immediate to read.
> pass : yes: nothing to worry about
> pass : excluded: installation was not attempted for the given reason
> pass : no: some error occurred, information attached
> In general, there is not much you can do for the excluded cases.
> The failed ones (pass : no) are in general fixable, but sometimes
> cooperation among more than 1 maintainer might be needed (rocks contending
> the same module).
> As explained before, I am going to fix *some* of the contended module issues
> by myself where it makes sense (for instance: metalua-*).
> Please let me know if something is still unclear.