"Philippe Lhoste" <PhiLho@gmx.net> wrote:
> Cool, beside the (possible) syntax differences, does it
> have any advantage / limitation with regard to other
> FFI libraries like Alien? I am not sure if Alien is still
> maintained, though.
Given the large number of bindings announced for LuaJIT's FFI in just the last year, that alone is a great reason to support the development of luaffi.
When I had previously used Alien, it seemed to work OK for our small project. I don't know of any specific advantages or limitations with that vs. luaffi.