[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: bit.lshift and performance - luabitop v.s. lua-5.2.0-work4
- From: KHMan <keinhong@...>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:25:38 +0800
On 10/13/2010 6:05 PM, Mike Pall wrote:
I think compression/decompression routines written in Lua is more
suitable for prototyping work and hence performance is not a
critical issue -- it's not for any real "normal user" apps, is it?
Heavens, before long, someone will lobby for tweaks to run FFT or
DCT in Lua...
Why do you think so? Is this some kind of prevalent inferiority
complex with users of scripting languages? That it's somehow 'bad'
to implement such functionality using Lua?
*yawn* oh cool, looks like I successfully pressed some buttons
Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia