[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua: open source or not?
- From: Henrique Becker <henriquebecker91@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:15:15 -0300
"Open Source" confused with "Open Development"?
2010/9/29, Jonathan Castello <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Lucas Zawacki <email@example.com> wrote:
>> In my opnion it should be read like "Lua is not like the average
>> open-source projects" because of the reasons stated right after the
>> "misleading" line. Anyway, the license (and the freely available code)
>> seem to speak louder than this statement.
> It specifically says "Lua is not an open-source project" in one
> breath. I understand what it means, but taken alone, that line can be