[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua: open source or not?
- From: Lucas Zawacki <lfzawacki@...>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:28:16 -0300
In my opnion it should be read like "Lua is not like the average
open-source projects" because of the reasons stated right after the
"misleading" line. Anyway, the license (and the freely available code)
seem to speak louder than this statement.
2010/9/29 Jonathan Castello <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Nick Gammon <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Are the words "open source" being used in different ways here?
> Personally, I understood it to mean that the official Lua distribution
> is only developed by the core team, but the code itself is free to be
> modified and re-distributed. I think the line from about.html is
> unclear and a little misleading in its use of "open-source".