[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Assembler Interface of LuaJIT VM.
- From: neha mahajan <mahajan.neha.jal@...>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:24:45 +0530
Thanks Mike for clarification.
but I wanted to know that on what basis Action Names and their numbers are assigned for a particular architecture. I have checked out both x86 & ppc code. The build_actionlist is so confusing in itself. can you put some light on these aspects also. As action names are different from opcodes for a particular architecture.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Mike Pall <email@example.com>
neha mahajan wrote:There is no need to disassemble anything; LuaJIT is distributed
> we have already disassemble the lj_vm.s, but its corresponding pseudo code
> or logic functionality of these assembly functions are still missing.
with source code. The interpreter is generated from the *.dasc
files and these have all the comments.