[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Lua 5.2
- From: Vaughan McAlley <ockegheim@...>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:59:58 +1100
You may want to use two bitLibs simultaneously, for a particular
combination of compatibility, ease of use, new features or whatever.
In that case it would be good if they had different names.
2010/1/28 Jerome Vuarand <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> 2010/1/28 Alexander Gladysh <email@example.com>:
> > If someone wants to replace existing library, he should pick another
> > name for the replacement. Especially if that someone is not people who
> > develop the language.
> As long as the library has the same API, I see no reason not to use
> the same name. This is especially important if you want a third party
> module to use the modified version.