[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: 3.2 Bug
- From: Supratik Champati <champati@...>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 16:42:07 -0400
I do not know if my earlier message got posted - so here it is again.
I actually wanted to say that the cause 'isnt' rather obvious.
The reason is that initially ls->fs->f->consts is NULL.
The call checkname(ls) in turn calls next_constant()
which grows the array. On HPUX machines it is dumping core
as it is trying to access a NULL array. (Zero Page Read
reported by purify). On SGI it seems to run fine.
>It's not at all obvious too me.
>Unfortunately, we don't have access to HPUX machines.
>Could you please send me details? What compiler? gcc?
>Perhaps we could compare the assembly output for the two versions of