Re: dot-d

[Scott Morgan <blumf@...>]

On 5/15/23 02:22, Soni "They/Them" L. wrote:
> > Beyond that, just tweak the package.* items to suit your particular 
> > requirements.
>
> No, since that is not using the convention of treating the contents of 
> foo.lua.d/ as subfiles of foo.lua.

What convention? Who is using anything.lua.d?

Why can't you change the package.* items in Lua to solve this yourself? 
I'm pretty sure just changing package.path and package.cpath would do it.