Re: dot-d

[Scott Morgan <blumf@...>]

On 5/15/23 01:15, Soni "They/Them" L. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are wondering, if it would be possible to support foo.lua.d/bar.lua 
> for require("foo.bar").
>
> See, Linux really really wants file-dir duality. You can tell by all the 
> .d/'s everywhere. Unfortunately POSIX forbids file-dir duality. So .d/'s 
> everywhere is the best we're gonna get. But it'd be nice to see them 
> more widely supported.

Wouldn't foo/init.lua + foo/bar.lua  achieve the same result for you?

foo = require"foo"
bar = require"foo.bar"

Beyond that, just tweak the package.* items to suit your particular 
requirements.

Scott